Katherine Fultons latest work is out. A follow up to her groundbreaking study Looking Out for the Future (produced by the Monitor Institute), What’s Next for Philanthropy is the latest in their decade of work. The report:
You can download the full report here
They will develop guides on issues as donor motivations and interest areas, philanthropic approaches and strategies, family roles and personal involvement, operational questions, and impact assessment. Featuring real-life case studies, the guides will offer examples designed to provide context and inspiration and, once completed, will be available free of charge through a new donor resource section at the RPA Web site that will also feature profiles of donors, philanthropically active families, and various supporting documents, resources, and links.
"Giving away money can be a relatively simple process; however, giving it effectively is an entirely different matter," said RPA board chair Kevin P.A. Broderick. "Helping donors create thoughtful, effective philanthropy is our sole mission and we are grateful to the Gates Foundation for providing core resources toward that goal.
A recent study by the Commonfund Institute found endowments held by foundations and nonprofits grew by an average of 21 percent last fiscal year. While it is certainly great news, keep in mind that this gain does not make up for the sharp declines of 2008. Those declines averaged 26-percent in 2008.
Even though they made back some of the losses, many foundations and charities cut back further on giving and spending. Fifty-five percent of community foundations,gave less in 2009, while only 16 percent said they gave more.
The Community Foundation of Utah gave more - but this was our first year of giving!
"For a number of reasons, nonprofits often don't have traditional and short-term working capital tools available to them," said CHF vice president of philanthropy Kelly Dunkin. "This is particularly true in today's banking environment. The Loan Fund [will provide] borrowers [with] short-term loans in larger amounts and at an interest rate well below what traditional lenders offer."
Bill and Melinda Gates together with Warren Buffett have begun a campaign to encourage the nation’s billionaires to give at least half of their fortunes to charity.
The roots of the Giving Pledge campaign can be traced to a meeting in May 2009 where Bill Gates brought together some of the nation’s wealthiest philanthropists and discussed ideas including how to encourage wealthy Americans to give more. Beginning with the Forbes list of the four hundred wealthiest Americans, the campaign will encourage the nation’s super-rich to pledge at least 50 percent of their net worth to charitable causes, either during their lifetimes or at death.
If the Forbes 400 take up this challenge, they could give an additional $600 billion or more to charity. To put that in perspective, total charitable giving in the United States has topped $300 billion in each of the last three years. According to IRS records and estimates by Fortune, the wealthiest Americans gave between 8 and 11 percent of the total adjusted income to charity in 2007.
According to Buffett, anyone who is rich has thought about what to do with his or her money. “They may not have reached a decision about that, but they have for sure thought about it,” Buffett told Fortune. “The pledge that we’re asking them to make will put them thinking about the whole issue again.”
In a time when many nonprofit organizations are struggling and there is little support for potentially impactful projects, many foundations are beginning to rely on loans, loan guarantees, and program-related investments, or PRIs, as a way of supporting these organizations without diminishing their assets.
Private foundations are required to disperse 5 percent of the market value of their assets as a condition of their tax exemption. With the drastic decline in the stock market in 2008 and 2009, the amount that must be paid has likewise declined. Because of this, many foundations across the country have begun to rely on program-related investments. Program-related investments are similar to grants in that they put money toward projects that have financial need. However, unlike grants, they also provide a return of the principle to the granting foundation, enabling them to put more money to work in the community.
Using a PRI, the Community Health Foundation of Western and Central New York was able to provide a $650,000 loan to Community Care of Western New York to begin an initiative that allowed more than two hundred rural elderly people to remain in their homes.
A must read if you like the way the CF of Utah is apprachign corprate engagement!
"The days of corporate philanthropy being about cutting checks for charity dinners and new buildings are over—or if they're not, they should be, and fast. That was one of the messages at the conference here this week of the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy, which gathered leaders of company foundations, giving officers, and corporate executives.The conference's discussion was influenced, in part, by the release of a report conducted for the nonprofit association by McKinsey & Company, called Shaping the Future: Solving Social Problems Through Business Strategy. The report says companies need to be much more engaged in solving social and environmental problems. Traditional philanthropy is not enough, it says. Corporations need to find opportunities to use their business skills to advance social causes. Doing so can generate financial benefits.
To be published in the July/August issue of the Association of Fundraising Professionals' Advancing Philanthropy magazine, the report found that last year's 4.9 percent decline in individual giving (also known as household giving) followed a similar decline in 2008, when individual giving was down 6 percent from the previous year. This year, in contrast, individual giving totals are expected to range from $222 billion to $227 billion, a year-over-year increase of between 3 percent and 4.5 percent.
Invite George Soros. Ask Sting and Stevie Wonder to entertain. Don;t forget Michael Bloomberg. Oh and make sure Wall Street feels a special need for some good PR.
Here is their press release. And they do support fantastic groups so ... feel free to feel jealous, but in a good way.
Robin Hood, the city's leading poverty-fighting organization, last night raised $87.8 million at its annual benefit with 100 percent of the donations going to organizations that generate measurable results for New Yorkers in need, as Robin Hood's board underwrites all of the event's costs. All event donations were matched 1:1 through a special challenge grant from global philanthropist George Soros and the Robin Hood Board of Directors.The benefit was co-chaired by Robin Hood Board Vice Chair Lee Ainslie of Maverick Capital, Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase and Eric Schmidt of Google. Brian Williams served as host for the 21st annual event, while Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers provided entertainment. Surprise guest Sting came out on stage to play for the crowd and Stevie Wonder capped the evening off by performing for the more than 3,800 guests who gathered at the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center for the fundraiser.
"Fifty-five percent of babies born in New York City are born into poverty, and we have to change that," said David Saltzman, Robin Hood's Executive Director. "Tonight our incredibly generous donors made a big investment towards saving lives of New Yorkers in need."
From Caroline Preston's blog by way of CFU Trustee Patrick de Freitas
Nonprofit groups say it takes them 25 to 30 hours to apply for a grant. Yet most of the grants being awarded are probably $15,000 or less.
That's much of what's wrong with philanthropy today, Bill Somerville, founder of Philanthropic Ventures Foundation, told an audience of young grant makers here at the first conference of Emerging Practitioners in Philanthropy. He said the figures on grant size were based on information from the Foundation Center.
"This is absurd; it's patronizing," Mr. Somerville said. "Philanthropy needs reform."
Mr. Somerville, whose foundation does "paperless" grant making and promises a 48-hour turnaround on grant decisions, urged young foundation officials to help grant makers become smarter, faster, and more responsive. His directives included:
This morning's WSJ has an artcile describing how philanthropists managing family foundations have had to be especially diligent in imparting the skills that their children need to carry on the philanthropic tradition, while also showing them how to "stretch a dollar,".
They cite data from the Foundation Center showing U.S. foundations lost nearly $150 billion in assets in 2008 -- nearly as much as they had awarded during the four years prior! The result? One in five foundations cut back their grantmaking in 2009 and expect to give less in the next few years.
According to the article, parents have formed junior boards of directors or foundation committees so their heirs can lern the ropes by developing a foundation Web site., running 'mini-foundations', etc.
They have also pooled their giving. For example, since 2007, nearly two hundred donors in their twenties and thirties have donated 1 percent of their annual income to the One Percent Foundation, an online giving circle for young philanthropists started by thirty-year-old Daniel Kaufman.
Read the full piece here.
Download the report here
The study had 1,046 respondents over half with more than $1 million in assets, the remainder had more than $500,000 in assets.